I had a perspective-changing talk on the subject of pay walls with the chief executive of a big publishing company (no, I can’t tell you who). He asked me what I think about pay walls.
I told him what I always say: The main currency of news sites is attention not dollars, and that I believe that it is the publisher’s job to turn that attention into money, to keep the attention machine running. He nodded and made the following, astonishing statement:
I can’t see pay walls working out either. But we need to do something before we lose all of our current subscribers. Sure. It’s a tough business environment, but... But the flight industry is a tough environment too, and they found ways. So tell me: Why do people fly Business Class? In the end, an airplane brings me to the same place regardless of whether I fly Economy or Business Class, and the massive price-increase I pay doesn’t compare the difference in value.
He asked whether I knew of a way to apply this logic to online news. What would a Business Class news site look like?
People pay for Business Class because they don’t want to be tortured in Economy. They get faster lanes at the security check. They get an extra glass of champagne. The stewards are more attentive. They get off the plane more quickly. They get the feeling of a higher social status.
And he added that he wished that there was a way to lead each reader through to Economy again, to again show what they avoided by being in Business Class.
Say what you want, but he has a point. Reading news online feels like flying Economy. Loud distracting banners, cheap stock picture material, sloppy typography, a lot of useless comment noise, machine generated reading tips, no human service, and a claustrophobic information design make the reading experience a torture.
If you’ve been designing online newspapers as well, of course, you know that designers cannot solve this problem by themselves. Newspapers need to make money. And most newspapers look the way they look because that’s what the design brief dictated. The following comparison demonstrates how much space and attention this marketing strategy requires to subsidize the product, and how small the space is for actual content:
Even with all this noise, it seems online news still doesn’t make enough money. Some newspapers try to tackle the financial problem by erecting pay walls. “You want information? Pay up!” But, as many have noted before, that’s a tough sell in a medium where information exists in overflow. The strategic problems with pay walls have been discussed extensively:
To be clear: content pay walls are not what we are suggesting. Remember, whether you fly Economy or Business: the result is the same (you travel from a to b), and only the experience differs. And likewise Business Class and Economy class seats on news sites should deliver the same content.
The idea of creating a business class for online news is not about buying information, but buying better experience, it’s about service and customer experience. That’s right: customer (paying), not user (free).
The idea of creating a business around the terrible online news experience is not that extravagant: Instapaper, Readability, FlipBoard & co. are already profiting from the terrible reading experience of current news sites. Actually, Jay Rosen has suggested that it should have been publishing houses that released FlipBoard (and with news.me the NYT is just doing that). All these reading interfaces have one thing in common:
…and they have the advantage of collecting news from different sources. What they don’t have, but publishing houses could provide:
Now, wouldn’t it be at least worth a try to add a business class version to your site instead of leaving it to the booming reader industry?
What would a business class version of a news site be like? We are currently working on a behind-the-scenes consulting project dealing with that problem, and, as far as we can see, it’s not impossible as one might think. Obviously we can’t show you the actual designs, but here’s an example of just one aspect. Here is what happens to the New York Times if you get rid of the noise:
Which one would you rather read? What if you could get the loud one for free and pay for the nice one? Would you be tempted? And would you be tempted to use the same interface for other news as well?
No, you don’t need to make the free version ugly on purpose—apparently, airlines do torture us on purpose in Economy class—the traditional CPV/ad model design requirements will do the job for you.
It is understood that it’s difficult to make a business class version for the New York Post; you need a brand that fulfills the promise of “Business Class”. The business class idea would only work for titles like The New Yorker, Die Zeit, Il Sole 24 Ore, Le Monde (Le Monde actually has a similar concept in place but the upsell is tied to more information, not better experience—which, again, is not what we’re suggesting).
So here is our question for you: as a regular reader of Le Monde, NYT, or Die Zeit, how much would you be ready to pay for a business class version of your news site? I’m guessing that it should be a yearly fee. It doesn’t hurt to pay $99 once a year, but it hurts to pay $10 per month. Keep in mind that the above design is just a quick mockup, and that the benefits go beyond a better design.
So. How much? $0, $5, $9, $49, $99, $299 per year? What if in addition you could read other news sources through the same interface as well? We’d be happy if you could send us a tweet with the price you’d be ready to pay.