INFORMATION
Information: Structured data. The opposite of Entropy. Information changes its meaning depending on Context. In the DIKW Pyramid, structured information is knowledge, while organized knowledge ultimately leads to wisdom—but we’re pretty sure that you need wisdom to deal with knowledge. We focus on structuring information and hope to glimpse the peak of the DIKW pyramid, now and then. In information theory, information is the ultimate particle in the universe where matter is energy and energy is data in motion. But that’s Metaphysics.
Will information technology affect our minds the same way the environment was affected by our analogue technology? Designers hold a key position in dealing with ever increasing data pollution. We are mostly focused on speeding things up, on making sharing easier, faster, more accessible. But speed, usability, accessibility are not the main issue anymore.
How do you deal with erroneous tweets? Not any erroneous tweets, your erroneous tweets. The tweets that you misspelled or, worse, that contain information you later discover is false, or a late night knee-jerk response you regret in the morning.
I'm not a nuclear expert. I am a 40-year-old Swiss web designer, with a degree in philosophy, living in Tokyo. And I'm a father of a two-year-old boy. I was nonchalant about nuclear energy so far, but recently, I've read a lot about it; it's hard to understand the discussion.
Our latest Web Trend Map tells the story of Twitter and its 140 most influential Twitter users. Surprisingly, it’s even more popular than Web Trend Map 4.
Hier ist unsere nächste Web Trend Map. In diesem Jahr gibt es keinen Metro-Fahrplan und auch keine Internet-Adressen. Stattdessen zeigen wir die 140 einflussreichsten Twitter User mit #Namen, #Alias, #Kategorie, #Einfluss, #Aktivität sowie wann und was sie zum ersten mal getwittert haben.
When confronted with the necessity of offering news for free, editors are quick at pointing at the cost involved in news production. Which of course is beside the point. Information on the Internet is as common as snow in the arctic. You can't expect Eskimos to buy a snowman.
Recently, there has been a quality renaissance in the discussion about the economic future of journalism. While some are still touting the one miracle solution (usually alluding to Google’s business model and success), a lot of ideas have arisen that will probably make up for the economic future of journalism as a whole. Time for a summary.
"Social media marketing" is bullshit. If that upsets you, don't read the following text.
The IT-Revolution promised to free and enrich us. To free us from propaganda, to free us from mindless TV, to free us from advertisement torture, and to enrich us by letting machines do all the boring work so we'd have more free time. So, how did it go?
This year we have seven predictions. If they are as accurate as last year’s, we should make this a paid service.
Here’s what we said was going to happen in 2007 one year ago, compared to what really happened…
Earlier this year we speculated that in 2007 "Big ad investments start streaming in". Our prognosis was heavily understated.
The amount of spam and flooding blogs and mailboxes is getting worse and worse and worse. How should we stop it?
When people ask me about my background, they're confused. I studied philosophy. How come I do web design? In short: The old Greeks brought me here. What can Internet workers learn from the old Greeks?